No, it’s not family first
I was out and about the other day and saw a sign that read: “Family First!”
At first, I barely noticed it. It was the kind of thing you see on billboards all the time and just move past without much thought.
But later that day, sitting around the dinner table with my family, that slogan flashed into my memory because, dare I say it, it was wrong!
We were talking about right and wrong and I found myself saying something that my daughter wasn't too pleased with at first:
"If I were a judge in a case, and you were in the wrong… I’d have no problem ruling against you."
Daughter #3: "Even though I'm your daughter?"
"Yes."
It felt like a strange thing to say out loud. Because everything in us is wired to protect our own.
So let me ask the uncomfortable question: What if family doesn’t come first?
When loyalty conflicts with principle
That statement doesn’t sit well at first. Because we’re taught - culturally, emotionally, instinctively even - that family is everything.
And it is… to a point. But there’s something even more important.
Principle.
There’s a well-known narration about Prophet Muhammad ﷺ where he makes a statement that cuts through any idea of favouritism:
“By God, if Fatimah bint Muhammad, the daughter of Muhammad, were to steal, I would cut off her hand.”
Now, before we have everyone up in arms (see what I did there?), this wasn’t about punishment. It was about principle. It was about justice that does not bend depending on who is involved. About a standard that applies equitably - even to those we love most.
The lie we love to tell ourselves
How many scandals, cover-ups or cases of blatant nepotism haven't we seen? And, in almost every case, the guilty party will swear they were just protecting their family.
Covering for them. Defending them. Explaining away their behaviour.
But actually… what we call protection is something else entirely.
Bias.
And bias, even when it comes from love, has consequences. Because when we lower the standard for those closest to us, we don’t help them.
We limit them, we prevent their growth and we delay accountability. We quietly teach them that who they are (or who they know) matters more than what is right.
And that lesson doesn’t serve them in the long run.
What real care looks like
"Being clear is caring" I absolutely love this Brené Brown quote.
Because there are moments when doing right by your family doesn’t look like support. Instead, it looks like discomfort. It looks like holding a line. It looks like saying the hard thing.
It looks like allowing them to face consequences.
And yes - they may not appreciate it in the moment. But real care isn’t about how something feels now. It’s about what it builds over time.
The leadership test
So why is a leadership coach talking about judging against his daughter? Because this doesn’t just show up in families.
It shows up everywhere: in teams, in organisations, in communities.
Leaders who can’t hold their own people accountable eventually lose the trust of everyone else. Leaders who don't call out poor behaviour quietly endorse it. Leaders who don’t coach and manage poor performance tells the rest that their efforts are in vain.
And people will notice.
They notice when standards shift.
They notice when certain people are protected.
They notice when fairness becomes selective.
And once that trust is gone, it’s incredibly hard to get back.
A better way to think about it
Let's just clear the air - this isn’t about saying family doesn’t matter. It’s about recognising that family is not above principle.
In fact, it’s the opposite. Your family deserves better than bias.
They deserve truth.
They deserve justice.
They deserve the kind of integrity that doesn’t change depending on who is involved.
Final thought
Loving someone doesn’t mean shielding them from truth. Sometimes it means holding them to it.
Because if your principles change depending on who is involved… they’re not principles.
So here’s something to sit with:
Where in your life are you lowering the standard… because of who someone is to you?
Where are you choosing comfort over clarity? Protection over principle?
And what would it look like - not just to say you value fairness - but to actually live it when it costs you something?
What does your principled-based Next Step look like?